Authentic

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants:

Home

Series Code: AU

Program Code: AU000041S


00:01 - It's the biggest problem that human beings
00:02 have ever wrestled with,
00:04 the question of why we suffer
00:06 if the one who made the universe in the first place
00:09 is supposed to be good.
00:10 That's our subject on today's episode of "Authentic."
00:14 [upbeat music]
00:36 It occurs to me now that we're 30 some episodes
00:38 into this show
00:39 that it's probably time to have a little talk
00:41 about theodicy,
00:42 which is a $10 word for the problem of evil,
00:47 and the problem of evil kind of runs like this.
00:49 People say that God is perfect
00:51 and that he is all powerful and that he is love,
00:54 and that he's all those things at the same time.
00:57 So you would think that God would be able
00:59 to stop human suffering if he wanted to.
01:03 In other words, the problem runs like this.
01:05 We have a good God and a bad world,
01:07 and you've got to wonder why.
01:09 any answer to that question is considered a theodicy,
01:13 which amounts to a defense of God and his character.
01:16 We get the word theodicy
01:18 from an 18th century German philosopher
01:20 by the name of Gottfried Leibniz,
01:22 who went out of his way to defend the idea
01:24 that the universe is ultimately a good place,
01:28 in spite of what we might perceive it to be
01:31 from our perspective.
01:33 And you'll notice that somewhere underneath the question,
01:36 the question of a bad world and a good God,
01:39 there's an implicit accusation
01:41 that maybe there's something wrong with God.
01:44 Of course, my atheist friends will insist
01:47 that there's not just something wrong with God,
01:49 but that there's something wrong with the idea of God,
01:52 and to their way of thinking,
01:53 the problem of evil probably proves
01:56 that God doesn't exist at all.
01:59 I'll give you an example of this kind of reasoning,
02:01 one that I've read before on show, probably more than once,
02:05 because, well, this example's so blatant.
02:08 It's the first one that comes to mind,
02:09 and I'm, guess I'm gonna take the easy path here.
02:12 Maybe one day I'll find some new quotes
02:14 so you don't start thinking I've just read one book,
02:16 but for the last time perhaps,
02:19 here's a statement from Richard Dawkins,
02:21 everybody's favorite atheist whipping boy,
02:23 because, well, he just makes this so easy.
02:26 Here we go.
02:27 An argument from an atheist
02:28 that is really just a different version
02:30 of the problem of evil.
02:31 He writes, "The God of the Old Testament
02:34 "is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction:
02:37 "jealous and proud of it,
02:39 "a petty, unjust, unforgiving, control-freak,
02:42 "a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser,
02:45 "a misogynistic, homophobic, racist,
02:48 "infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal,
02:51 "pestilential, megalomaniacal,
02:53 "sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully,"
02:58 ha, end of quote.
03:00 And I'm not sure I need to unpack that for you,
03:02 because what he's saying is pretty obvious.
03:04 He's telling us, look, if God is real,
03:06 then he can't be what people claim he is.
03:08 He most certainly is not a God of love.
03:12 And Dawkins is drawing
03:13 from some admittedly difficult passages
03:15 from the Old Testament,
03:17 but what he's do is cherry picking the data
03:20 to create the worst possible picture.
03:23 He ignores the all important context,
03:26 the bigger picture provided by the other parts of the Bible.
03:30 But for right now, it's important to notice
03:32 that Dawkins is questioning the goodness of God
03:35 in a world where very bad things happen,
03:38 and the conclusion he wants you to draw
03:40 is that God probably does not exist.
03:43 For a lot of atheists, the argument kind of runs like this.
03:47 Evil and the idea of a loving God
03:48 are completely incompatible,
03:51 and because evil exists,
03:53 that probably means that God does not.
03:57 The problem of evil is one of the most
03:59 fundamental questions in philosophy,
04:01 and it can lead to any number of disturbing conclusions.
04:05 Some people will say that if God and evil
04:08 both exist simultaneously,
04:11 that would mean that God is either uncaring,
04:14 which is not a great conclusion,
04:16 or he's powerless to do anything about our condition,
04:19 which is also not a great conclusion.
04:22 Now, the other possibility is that God
04:25 is just a figment of our imagination,
04:26 he doesn't exist at all.
04:28 Which means that you and I might be
04:30 utterly alone in this universe,
04:33 and of course that is also an unappealing conclusion,
04:37 a conclusion that kind of defies this inborn sense
04:40 that most of us have
04:41 that there must be something else out there.
04:45 The idea that we are nothing but accidents
04:47 makes it hard to explain
04:49 why we happen to be such complicated accidents
04:52 with deep emotions and the ability
04:54 to reflect on our own existence.
04:56 The very phenomenon of human consciousness
04:59 suggests that somehow mind existed before matter existed,
05:05 because it's really hard to fathom how consciousness
05:07 could emerge from mere physical particles.
05:11 So the idea that God doesn't exist
05:13 really rubs most people's fur the wrong way.
05:16 Unless of course you happen to suspect
05:19 that your choices in life
05:20 might require you to give an answer for what you've done,
05:24 in which case the idea of meeting God
05:26 can seem very unappealing.
05:29 But even then, I don't think that most people
05:32 hope that God isn't real.
05:34 I mean, there are a few out there, but not many.
05:37 Most people hope that God is merciful,
05:40 because who in the world wouldn't want
05:43 a loving and merciful God?
05:46 You know, years ago I was working in the city of Rome
05:48 and I met this guy who was really interested
05:51 in a seminar I was presenting over a number of weeks
05:54 there in the city,
05:56 and after getting to know him,
05:57 we met for a friendly discussion.
05:59 And at one point he suddenly said,
06:00 "Look Shawn, I don't know how I can possibly accept
06:04 "what you've been talking about,
06:05 "because we don't even know if Jesus ever really existed."
06:10 Now, very few people actually doubt
06:13 the existence of a historical Jesus.
06:16 They might have argue that he was nothing
06:17 but a popular countryside teacher,
06:20 or they might argue that he simply died on a cross
06:22 and never rose from the dead,
06:24 but very few people doubt that he actually existed,
06:27 because the mark he left on this world
06:29 is just far too obvious.
06:32 Even if you happen to believe
06:34 that the stories in the New Testament are exaggerated,
06:36 or that a lot of erroneous dogma
06:39 has been piled on top of the story,
06:41 few people doubt that Jesus was a real historical person.
06:48 So I decided I wasn't gonna argue with my new friend,
06:49 because I figured what he was saying
06:51 was a bit of a dodge anyway,
06:53 and it wasn't really the issue he was struggling with.
06:56 So instead I pointed to my Bible and I said,
06:59 "Listen, let me just ask you one question.
07:02 "Do you hope what this book says is true,
07:06 "or do you hope that it isn't?"
07:08 And he was quiet for a moment, and then he started to cry.
07:11 He said, "I'd have to be a fool
07:14 "to hope that it wasn't true."
07:16 And I guess I'm telling you that story
07:18 to underline the point that most people don't hope
07:21 that God isn't real.
07:23 I mean, they might not like God,
07:25 or at least the picture of God they were raised with,
07:28 but when you actually see the narrative
07:30 presented in the scriptures,
07:32 the story of a loving and merciful God
07:34 who goes out of his way to save us,
07:37 well, most of us want that to be true,
07:39 and a lot of us are just really afraid
07:41 that this wonderful story might not apply to us,
07:46 which brings us back to the problem of evil.
07:49 One of the conclusions people come to
07:51 when faced with the existence of evil in this world
07:54 is that God does not exist,
07:56 and as I've already said, that is not a happy a conclusion.
08:00 But the other possibilities,
08:02 that God is powerless to deal with evil,
08:04 or that he doesn't care,
08:06 well, those aren't appealing either.
08:09 So then what do we do with the idea of pain and suffering?
08:12 How do we reconcile that idea
08:14 with the loving and merciful God
08:16 that Christians sing about in church?
08:19 Well, I sincerely doubt
08:21 that I'm gonna be able to answer that question
08:22 in just a few short minutes,
08:24 because this is a question that philosophers
08:27 have wrestled with for thousands of years,
08:30 and most of the people who wrestle with it
08:32 are a lot brighter than me.
08:34 Now, I've seen some people suggest
08:36 that this is the question behind all philosophy,
08:40 people like Susan Neiman,
08:42 whom I'm starting to suspect is probably right.
08:45 I mean, if life on this world was paradise,
08:49 we might still contemplate the meaning of life,
08:52 but without suffering,
08:54 you've got to wonder how much the question
08:55 would actually bother us.
08:57 Because there's something about suffering
08:59 that really makes us wonder
09:01 what in the world we're doing here.
09:04 So if the problem of evil is not the big question,
09:08 there's no doubt it's one of the big ones,
09:11 and in a moment, I'll be right back to look at this
09:13 just a little bit more.
09:19 - [Announcer] Dragons, beasts, cryptic statues.
09:23 Bible prophecy can be incredibly vivid and confusing.
09:27 If you've ever read Daniel or Revelation
09:30 and come away scratching your head, you're not alone.
09:33 Our free "Focus On Prophecy" guides
09:35 are designed to help you unlock the mysteries of the Bible
09:38 and to deepen your understanding of God's plan
09:40 for you and our world.
09:42 Study online or request them by mail
09:44 and start bringing prophecy into focus today.
09:48 - Near the beginning of the enlightenment,
09:50 there was this great deal of enthusiasm
09:53 for the burgeoning art of scientific discovery.
09:58 We began to suspect that maybe our human ingenuity
10:00 and our capacity for reason
10:02 could be used to tame the world we live in,
10:05 and solve many, if not most of our biggest problems.
10:08 And to a small extent, it's kind of been true.
10:11 For example, I'm deeply appreciative
10:13 of the extended lifespans that we seem to enjoy now.
10:17 But then of course, the senseless violence
10:19 we witnessed in the 20th century
10:21 kind of put the breaks on our optimism,
10:24 because when you have something like 200 million people
10:27 dying from warfare in a single century,
10:30 you start to realize that scientific discovery
10:32 and technological advancement
10:34 have only magnified our problems instead of solving them.
10:38 It turns out there's something wrong with us,
10:41 and until we can correct the human heart,
10:43 the bigger problems just aren't going to go away.
10:47 And of course from a Christian perspective,
10:50 that's really the issue.
10:52 The suffering in this world doesn't stem from God,
10:54 it comes from us.
10:56 It's an indication that what the Bible suggests
10:59 about our fall from grace is true.
11:00 It says, "All have sinned
11:02 "and fall short of the glory of God."
11:05 But back in the early days of The Enlightenment,
11:07 they were discussing an additional problem.
11:10 Sin might explain some of the moral evil we experience
11:13 like murder, theft, or adultery,
11:16 but then what do we do with natural evil
11:18 like fires, floods, and earthquakes?
11:21 How in the world do we account for that kind of suffering,
11:24 which is not caused by an act of the human will?
11:29 What they were doing in the early years of The Enlightenment
11:31 was trying to explain this
11:33 in a way that preserved the idea of the biblical God.
11:36 We often think that science and faith
11:38 have always and radically opposed to each other,
11:41 but that wasn't true in the beginning.
11:43 The famous poet, Alexander Pope,
11:45 kind of highlights what we thought we were doing
11:48 when we started into the era of scientific discovery.
11:52 Let me read you an epitaph that he wrote
11:54 for Sir Isaac Newton,
11:55 the man who gave us a much clearer picture
11:57 of how the universe works
11:59 when he laid out the law of gravity.
12:02 This epitaph from Pope reads like this.
12:05 "Nature and nature's laws lay hid in night.
12:08 "God said, 'Let Newton be!' and all was light."
12:14 What Pope is saying is that God used Newton
12:16 to reveal something more about himself to humanity,
12:19 which was the prevailing attitude back in that day.
12:22 Scientific discovery was going to help us understand
12:25 more and more and more about God,
12:28 and that knowledge would help us resolve
12:30 some of our biggest questions.
12:32 Every time a new scientific principle was discovered,
12:35 it underlined the idea that we live in an orderly universe,
12:39 where if you only have the right tools,
12:41 you really can understand things,
12:43 and maybe even understand the creator.
12:46 Today, we're still excited by the idea
12:48 of exploring the far reaches of outer space,
12:51 an excitement that's reflected in our endless production
12:54 of new Star Trek variants.
12:56 And it's exciting to us because,
12:58 I mean, who knows what we're gonna find out there,
13:01 and who knows what those discoveries
13:02 are going to teach us about who or what we really are.
13:06 Now, our generation doesn't think of this
13:08 as a search for God,
13:10 but people in the 17th and 18th centuries really did.
13:14 Here's another example from Alexander Pope's famous poem,
13:17 "Essay on Man."
13:19 He writes, "Observe how system into system runs,
13:23 "what other planets circle other suns.
13:25 "What varied being peoples every star,
13:28 "May tell why heaven made us as we are."
13:32 What these people were hoping to do
13:34 was learn more about God,
13:35 which in turn would help us understand ourselves.
13:39 Now, that brings us to the German philosopher,
13:41 Gottfried Leibniz,
13:42 the person who coined that word, theodicy.
13:45 In fact, the only book he wrote
13:47 that was published during his lifetime
13:50 was his work on the problem of evil.
13:52 And in that book, he makes a couple
13:54 of very interesting contributions to the overall discussion.
13:58 He really digs into the idea that it must be possible
14:01 to reconcile the loving attributes of God
14:04 and the existence of suffering.
14:07 And again, the problem these philosophers were working on
14:10 kind of ran like this.
14:12 If God is pure and holy,
14:14 and he's also the creator of everything,
14:17 that would mean that he's also the creator of bad things,
14:20 and that would make him less than pure and holy.
14:23 So what these people were trying to do
14:25 was balance the moral universe and suggest that somehow,
14:28 all the good in the universe
14:29 actually outweighed all the bad,
14:32 and in the end God's character will be vindicated.
14:36 In other words, they were saying,
14:37 you and I just don't understand enough
14:39 in order to comprehend the problem, at least not yet.
14:43 Given enough time, Leibniz suggested,
14:45 we will understand the problem,
14:47 because our scientific pursuits will help us
14:49 see the universe as it really is.
14:52 He even suggested that we don't have the right language
14:55 to work on the problem, and until we do,
14:58 we're not really going to understand anything.
15:01 Leibniz speculated that once upon a time,
15:03 before the Tower of Babel,
15:05 human beings shared a universal language
15:08 that was much more powerful and much more complete
15:11 than the assortment of tongues that we speak today.
15:15 If only we could devise a new universal language,
15:19 he argued, one that allowed us to explore
15:21 deep philosophical questions
15:23 the same way we work on math problems,
15:27 then we would finally understand
15:28 that the overall condition of the universe is good.
15:32 We simply lack the ability to see that right now.
15:35 Now, here's the way he describes it in one of his essays.
15:38 He says, "But no one has put forward a language
15:42 "or characteristic which embodies, at the same time,
15:45 "both the art of discovery and the art of judgment,
15:48 "that is, a language whose marks or characters
15:51 "perform the same task
15:53 "as arithmetic marks do for numbers
15:55 "and algebraic marks do for magnitudes
15:58 "considered abstractly.
16:00 "And yet, when God bestowed these two sciences
16:03 "on the human race,
16:04 "it seems that he wanted to suggest to us
16:07 "that a much greater secret lies hidden in our intellect,
16:10 "a secret of which these two sciences are but shadows."
16:16 Now, Leibniz was kind of tapping into the world
16:19 of medieval alchemy,
16:20 because he mentions the mystic Jakob Bohme
16:22 in this same paragraph.
16:24 The Alchemist were big fans of Pythagoras,
16:27 the Greek thinker who attached mystical meanings
16:30 to geometry and numbers.
16:32 But the basic idea here is still science.
16:35 If we only had the right language, he argued,
16:38 then we could finally understand the universe.
16:42 And it's probably important to mention that Leibniz,
16:44 along with Isaac Newton, invented a calculus,
16:47 which is a mathematical way of measuring change.
16:50 Some of you probably had to take
16:51 calculus classes in school.
16:54 So Leibniz was coming to the universe
16:56 with the mind of a mathematician,
16:58 hoping that we can use scientific language
17:01 to open up the secrets of the universe.
17:04 This, he suggested, would give us the ability to see
17:07 that God really is good,
17:09 and that we have been wrong when we give so much weight
17:12 to the evil in this world.
17:14 Scientific exploration would finally reveal
17:17 that God really did create the best world possible.
17:22 Now, I've got to take a really quick break,
17:24 because, well, that's how things work around here,
17:27 but in a moment I'll be right back
17:28 to examine whether or not Leibniz was right
17:31 from a scriptural point of view.
17:35 - [Announcer] Here at "The Voice Of Prophecy,"
17:36 we're committed to creating top quality programming
17:39 for the whole family,
17:40 like our audio adventure series, "Discovery Mountain."
17:43 "Discovery Mountain" is a Bible-based program
17:46 for kids of all ages and backgrounds.
17:48 Your family will enjoy the faith-building stories
17:51 from this small mountain summer camp and town.
17:54 With 24 seasonal episodes every year
17:56 and fresh content every week,
17:59 there's always a new adventure just on the horizon.
18:07 - The German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz
18:09 argued that God really did make the best possible universe,
18:14 but that we're too limited in our understanding
18:16 to grasp that.
18:17 We just don't know enough.
18:20 And here's where I really want to give Leibniz some credit
18:23 because in many ways,
18:25 the Bible kind of supports that argument.
18:27 I'll give you a few examples.
18:28 There's a statement over in the book of Romans
18:31 where it tells us that human language
18:33 is inadequate to describe some things,
18:35 and that's where the mind of God begins to take over.
18:39 This passage admits that something is wrong with this world,
18:43 and then it tells us that we barely have the language
18:46 to describe it.
18:50 Eight, it says, "For we that the whole creation
18:53 "groans and labors with birth pains together until now."
18:58 So that's a description of the world we live in,
19:00 and it's telling us that human sinfulness
19:03 has not just caused the moral evil
19:05 committed by individuals,
19:07 but it has also led to natural evils,
19:10 because our rebellion has affected the whole of creation,
19:13 turning it into something it never used to be.
19:17 Paul continues by saying this.
19:19 "Not only that, but we also
19:22 "who have the firstfruits of the Spirit,
19:24 "even we ourselves groan within ourselves,
19:27 "eagerly waiting for the adoption,
19:29 "the redemption of our body.
19:31 "Likewise, the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses.
19:35 "For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought,
19:38 "but the Spirit himself makes intercession for us
19:41 "with groanings which cannot be uttered."
19:45 So there you have a number of elements
19:48 that Leibniz believed in.
19:49 Somehow, natural evil like fires, floods, and earthquakes,
19:54 and the evil choices of human beings are connected,
19:58 and you and I struggle to understand how and why that works.
20:01 In fact, we barely have the language to pray about it.
20:06 But are we really going to develop a new scientific language
20:09 that makes up for this deficit of understanding?
20:12 No, not in this lifetime,
20:15 not according to a famous passage
20:16 in Paul's first letter to the Corinthians.
20:19 Here's what he says.
20:21 "For we know in part and we prophesy in part."
20:25 So again, he's admitting that human knowledge
20:27 is very incomplete.
20:28 He continues, "But when that which is perfect has come,
20:32 "then that which is in part will be done away."
20:35 So he's looking forward to a time
20:38 when our knowledge will be more complete.
20:41 He says, "When I was a child, I spoke as a child.
20:45 "I understood as a child, I thought a child,
20:48 "but when I became a man, I put away childish things."
20:52 So now as a mature believer,
20:54 Paul is starting to understand things a little bit better,
20:57 not perfectly, but better.
21:00 It goes on.
21:01 "For now we see in a mirror, dimly,
21:04 "but then face to face.
21:06 Now I know in part, but then I shall know
21:09 "just as I also am known."
21:12 What Paul is saying is that you and I
21:14 only have a vague concept
21:16 of what perfection actually looks like,
21:19 and we won't understand the subject
21:21 until the human race has been completely restored.
21:25 So according to the Bible,
21:26 what Leibniz suspected is true,
21:29 you and I simply do not have complete understanding.
21:33 That same idea is reflected in what might be
21:35 the most ancient book in the Bible, the book of Job,
21:38 which is entirely dedicated
21:40 to the problem of suffering and evil.
21:43 For 37 chapters, Job and his friends
21:46 are trying to figure out why do Job has to suffer
21:49 when he's always been devoted to the creator.
21:51 And when job is done asking his questions,
21:54 God shows up and begins to ask some questions of his own.
21:57 Here's how that plays out now, in Job 38.
22:01 "Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind and said,
22:03 "'Who is this who darkens counsel
22:05 "'by words without knowledge?
22:08 "'Now prepare yourself like a man.
22:10 "'I will question you and you shall answer me.
22:13 "'Where were you? When I laid the foundations of the earth?
22:15 "'Tell me, if you have understanding.
22:18 "'Who determined its measurements?
22:19 "'Surely you know!
22:21 "'Or who stretched the line upon it?
22:22 "'To what were its foundations fastened?
22:24 ""Or who laid its cornerstone,
22:26 "when the morning stars sang together
22:28 "'and all the sons of God shouted for joy?'"
22:32 So in other words, God is saying,
22:33 "Look Job, you really don't have the tools you need
22:36 "to understand everything that happens in the universe.
22:39 "When this creation was first established,
22:41 "the sons of God, or the angels, shouted for joy.
22:44 "It was good.
22:46 "In fact, I declared it to be very good.
22:49 "And yes, it's different now, and now there's suffering.
22:52 "But you weren't there and you don't really understand."
22:56 Now that doesn't mean there aren't any good answers.
22:59 It just means that our human perspective is compromised
23:01 by a lack of understanding.
23:03 And it also means that God is going to help us
23:06 understand one day because Paul makes it clear
23:08 that when we finally see God face to face,
23:11 we will understand.
23:14 I'll be right back after this.
23:19 - [Announcer] Life can throw a lot at us.
23:22 Sometimes we don't have all the answers,
23:25 but that's where the Bible comes in.
23:27 It's our guide to a more fulfilling life.
23:31 Here at "The Voice of Prophecy,"
23:32 we've created the Discover Bible Guides
23:34 to be your guide to the Bible.
23:36 They're designed to be simple, easy to use,
23:38 and provide answers to many of life's toughest questions,
23:41 and they're absolutely free.
23:43 So jump online now, or give us a call
23:46 and start your journey of discovery.
23:49 - Well, we're running out of time again,
23:50 so it's probably a horrible idea
23:52 to move into brand new territory,
23:54 yet I do wanna point out that the Bible provides us
23:57 with something that the enlightenment philosophers did not.
24:00 It provides us with a promise.
24:04 I mean, Leibniz hinted at a promise,
24:06 he hinted at a time when people would finally understand
24:09 why we suffer,
24:11 but he places that promise at the feet
24:13 of rationality and science.
24:15 The Bible takes a different approach.
24:18 There are a number of scenes in the scriptures
24:20 that describe a final judgment
24:22 that takes place in several phases.
24:24 In Daniel seven, we see the angelic hosts
24:27 assembling at the throne of God
24:29 where the Books of Judgment are opened,
24:32 and the question you probably need to ask is this.
24:34 Why would an all-knowing God need books?
24:38 The answer is he doesn't,
24:40 but a mere created angel might.
24:43 You find the same thing over in Revelation 20,
24:45 but with human beings instead of angels.
24:47 It tells us we get to look at the books,
24:50 which is another way of saying
24:51 that we will eventually understand.
24:55 Now I know that argument doesn't make some people happy,
24:57 because we don't like to wait,
25:00 and we don't like to think that we don't know enough
25:02 to solve a problem, but there it is.
25:06 And we're gonna come back to this on another show.
25:09 At that moment, the Bible says,
25:11 God himself will reach out and wipe away our tears.
25:14 He will make us perfectly satisfied.
25:18 Here's what it says in Revelation, chapter seven.
25:22 "They shall neither hunger anymore nor thirst anymore.
25:26 "The sun shall not strike them nor any heat,
25:27 "for the Lamb who is in the midst of the throne
25:29 "will shepherd them and lead them
25:31 "to living fountains of waters.
25:33 "And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."
25:39 In other words, it's not going to be like this forever.
25:42 Now, that doesn't mean you can't get a better grasp
25:45 of the subject right now,
25:46 even if our own understanding is incomplete.
25:49 The rest of the Bible offers good answers
25:52 to the problem of evil that would frankly blow your mind
25:55 if you took the time to look at them.
25:59 You know, Leibniz predicted that in the future,
26:01 our understanding of God's goodness would grow,
26:04 and during the very next century,
26:06 a number of Christians
26:07 really to tackled this subject seriously.
26:10 One of those 19th century Christian writers
26:12 wrote about it in 1888, and she said this.
26:15 Now, this is one of my favorite passages
26:18 from Christian literature.
26:19 It's such a thought-provoking statement
26:21 that I thought I'd finish with it today.
26:23 She wrote, "It is impossible to so explain the origin of sin
26:28 "as to give a reason for its existence.
26:31 "Yet enough may be understood concerning both the origin
26:33 "and the final disposition of sin
26:36 "to fully make manifest the justice and benevolence of God
26:39 "in all his dealings with evil.
26:42 "Nothing is more plainly taught in scripture
26:45 "than that God was in nowise responsible
26:48 "for the entrance of sin,
26:50 "that there was no arbitrary withdrawal of divine grace,
26:54 "no deficiency in the divine government
26:56 "that gave occasion for the uprising of rebellion.
26:59 "Sin is an intruder for whose presence
27:02 "no reason can be given.
27:04 "It is mysterious, unaccountable,
27:06 "to excuse it is to defend it.
27:09 "Could excuse for it be found,
27:11 "or cause be shown for its existence,
27:13 "it would cease to be sin."
27:16 Apparently David Hume, the famous philosopher,
27:18 came to the same conclusion.
27:21 You can either recognize that evil exists,
27:24 or you can explain it, but you can't do both.
27:28 So I think I'm gonna let you chew on that idea
27:30 for this week.
27:31 Evil is a problem you're not gonna solve
27:33 only by using human logic,
27:35 because if you could find a good reason
27:38 for the existence of evil,
27:40 well, it wouldn't still be evil.
27:42 So maybe Leibniz was right.
27:43 You and I don't have the philosophical language
27:46 to describe the problem.
27:47 But that doesn't mean there isn't an answer,
27:49 because there is.
27:51 We're just gonna have to wait for God
27:53 to fill in some of the blanks.
27:55 Thanks for joining me this week.
27:56 This has been "Authentic," I'm Shawn Boonstra.
28:00 [upbeat music]


Home

Revised 2022-02-24