Wonderfully Made

Fevers & Immune System, Pt. 1

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants: N. David Emerson

Home

Series Code: WM

Program Code: WM000434


00:01 The following program presents principles designed
00:03 to promote good health and is not intended to take
00:05 the place of personalized professional care.
00:08 The opinions and ideas expressed are those of the speaker.
00:12 Viewers are encouraged to draw their own conclusions
00:14 about the information presented.
00:36 Hello. I am Dr. Emerson,
00:38 Medical Director at Eden Valley Lifestyle Center.
00:42 I am here to talk to you today about fever and immune system.
00:46 We want to learn about the powerful immune stimulant
00:49 effect produced by fever. Also we're going to look
00:53 at hyperthermy which is an artificial way
00:55 of producing or reproducing
00:57 these beneficial effects of fever.
01:00 We're gonna review some of the rationale
01:02 behind fever treatments. And then we'll conclude
01:05 with how it was been used in the past
01:07 and how it can be used, and is being used today.
01:11 At Eden Valley we work at strengthening
01:14 the immune system to help turn it on.
01:17 And also strengthen it in order to help people
01:20 in their fight against cancers. Well, first question
01:23 I'd like to ask though is can a depress immune system
01:26 cause cancers or allow to develop in the first place?
01:30 And if this is true then strengthening
01:33 or stimulating the immune system
01:36 should be helpful for cancer patients.
01:39 We're gonna be looking at the work
01:40 of Dr. Denise Prickett taken mainly from biography
01:45 by Nelson in 1998 as a source of some of the material
01:50 on his work regarding lymphomas.
01:54 Dr. Prickett was actually raised in England.
01:58 In his college years he gave his heart to Jesus
02:01 and felt call to go to Africa under the employment
02:05 of the government there to work as a surgeon.
02:09 Around 1957 he was presented with a small boy,
02:13 a five year old boy, who had the swellings
02:15 in his upper jaw, his lower jaw
02:19 and it was obviously cancerous, they did a biopsy,
02:23 it showed a small round cell sarcoma,
02:25 very malignant form of cancer. They found that it could affect
02:30 the eye, the jaw, the abdomen, and the kidney, the bone
02:33 or combinations of all of those. They found that it occurred
02:37 in children of ages two to twelve,
02:39 peak existence was around eight years of age.
02:43 And at that time there was nothing
02:45 they could do for it, it was lethal.
02:49 Well, he wanted to help, characterize this lymphoma,
02:55 so he took trips all over Africa.
02:58 And he plotted the distribution
02:59 of where this lymphoma was found.
03:01 And he found something interesting
03:03 that it was distributed in areas that had 20 inches
03:08 of rainfall or more. And temperatures that never
03:12 dropped below 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
03:16 Well, this was important because it matched the description
03:21 or the distribution of sleeping sickness
03:23 which is a parasitic disease spread by the tsetse flies.
03:27 It also spread, it fit the distribution
03:30 of the yellow fever which was a virus
03:33 spread by the mosquito. It also fit the distribution
03:38 of O'nyong'nyong fever or break bone fever
03:42 which is of another viral diseases spread by the mosquito.
03:46 And it fit the distribution of malaria,
03:48 which is a parasitic disease spread by the mosquito.
03:52 Well, with this distribution, the question arose,
03:55 could this lymphoma be caused by a virus
03:58 also spread by a mosquito? Since it was only found
04:02 in the areas that the mosquitoes
04:04 were spreading malaria and these viruses.
04:07 Well, to answer the question we want to go back
04:09 in history a bit, and find out
04:12 where our understanding of viruses came from.
04:16 And then ask the question,
04:17 can a virus indeed cause cancers?
04:20 Well, our understanding of viruses actually occurred
04:23 in the 1800s, with Louis Pasteur.
04:27 When he was developing the anthrax vaccine,
04:29 he could look under the microscope and he could see
04:32 the bacteria in the microscope. But later when he was developing
04:37 the rabies vaccine, he could not see
04:41 the infecting organism under the microscope and he said that
04:46 it must be caused by something infinitesimally small.
04:51 Well, we know today that it was actually caused
04:52 by the rabies virus, now which of course
04:57 you can see under a light microscope.
04:59 In 1892, Ivanowski identified a Tobacco Mosaic Virus,
05:06 which caused cancer. The way he discovered
05:11 that it was a virus, or caused by virus,
05:14 was he would take the tobacco leaf
05:16 that was infected with this virus,
05:19 crushed it up, add some water, and get the solution,
05:22 and then he would filter the solution
05:24 through porcelain filter. Now the porcelain filter
05:26 will take out all bacteria in all cells,
05:29 but will not take out viruses. These porcelain filters
05:34 can still be purchased today at camping stores
05:36 that used to filter water for campers very effective
05:40 in stopping bacterial and parasitic diseases.
05:45 So he would trans...transmit this fluid and pass it through
05:49 a porcelain filter. And then he would take
05:51 the....this fluid and inoculate another tobacco plant
05:56 and the tobacco plant will develop
05:58 this tobacco leaf diseases.
06:03 And again it was spread by something
06:05 that could not be seen under the microscope.
06:08 And in, excuse me in 1908, excuse me 1898 Serrano
06:14 discovered that a microscopically invisible
06:17 agent could also transmit cancer in animals.
06:22 He took some blood from a rabbit that had a fatal myxomas,
06:31 and he passed that through a porcelain filter.
06:35 Took out again all the cells, all the bacteria from the blood,
06:40 he just had fine, a solution and with that solution
06:43 that cell free solution inoculate another rabbit
06:47 and induced a cancer in that new rabbit.
06:52 And again this the way the fatal myxomas
06:55 were transmittedm from domestic rabbit to domestic rabbit.
06:59 In 1907 Merrick of Germany,
07:02 he described a lymphoid cancer in chickens,
07:05 it was highly infectious
07:06 and he presumed it was due to a virus.
07:10 In 1908 Elliman in bank of Copenhagen,
07:14 they took the blood of the leukemic chicken.
07:16 They filtered it again through one of these porcelain filters,
07:19 taking out all the cells, took the fluid inoculated
07:23 a healthy chicken and that healthy chicken
07:25 also developed leukemia.
07:28 A leukemia being spread by a virus.
07:32 In 1911 Peyton Rous, New York RockeFeller Institute,
07:35 transmitted a chicken sarcoma. This is a solid tumor
07:40 from healthy fowl two healthy fowls using
07:43 a again a cell free filtrate taking the blood
07:47 of a sick chicken when they had sarcoma
07:51 passing it through the filter taking it all the cells
07:54 and injecting that filter fluid into a healthy fowl
07:58 and inducing the sarcoma as well.
08:02 In 1932 Richard Shope, at the Rockefeller Institute
08:06 of Princeton transmitted a rabbit fibroma
08:09 with a cell free filtrate. And then in 1936, John Bittner,
08:15 he described a mouse breast cancer,
08:18 that could have actually transmitted to a nursing
08:22 female mice who later developed the breast cancer.
08:26 All these instances of cancers being transferred
08:28 from one animal to another implicated
08:31 an infectious virus transmission.
08:34 Where they ever able to see the virus?
08:38 It wasn't until 1945 when the electron microscope
08:41 was introduced that the first, the first viruses
08:44 could actually be clearly seen.
08:48 Following this in 1946, Claude, Porter and Pickels,
08:52 examined the Rous sarcoma which is a cancer,
08:57 they looked at the cells with electron microscope
08:59 and they reported dense particles
09:01 in the cytoplasm of the cells. And these are suspected
09:04 to be a virus causing the cancer.
09:09 Well, then in 1956, Anthony Epstein definitely
09:14 identified this tiny 70-millimicron Rous
09:17 sarcoma particles in the Rous sarcoma cells.
09:22 And this was a definite proof that Rous sarcoma virus
09:26 was indeed causing the sarcoma or the cancer in animals.
09:30 So we now had visible proof that viruses
09:34 could cause cancers in animals. In 1957 Stewart Netty,
09:42 at the National Institute of Health,
09:43 they propagated a prodded tumor virus
09:46 in a tissue culture which induced a variety
09:49 of tumors in mice, rats, and hamsters.
09:53 So by 1962, it was definitely established
09:57 that you could indeed cause cancers
09:59 and transmit cancers from animal to animal
10:02 with cell free filtrates that is viruses.
10:08 Now with the distribution of this lymphoma,
10:11 this human cancer in Africa,
10:15 the thought was could this human lymphoma
10:18 be transmitted by a virus also? Nobody as yet had demonstrated
10:24 that a human virus could be transmitted
10:26 from person to person. And so every one was anxious
10:30 to be the first to demonstrate the transmission
10:32 of a human cancer from one person to another.
10:36 Well, there are some more evidence that came up
10:39 in Zanzibar and Kinshasa which also tended to indicate
10:44 a viral transmission of this lymphoma.
10:49 They found that in Zanzibar and Kinshasa,
10:52 nobody there developed the lymphoma.
10:55 And yet they had rainfall that was over 20 inches a year,
11:00 and temperatures that never fell below 60 degrees
11:03 Fahrenheit which were both the conditions
11:05 for developing the lymphoma.
11:06 So if it was just the weather issue you would have expected
11:10 the lymphoma to be present in these two countries.
11:14 But what they found was that these were the only two
11:16 countries in Africa that had eradicated malaria,
11:19 by spraying of the water and are killing the mosquitoes.
11:24 And so, they're now showing that there seem to be a direct
11:28 relationship between the incidence and prevalence
11:30 and intensity of malaria and the incidence of lymphomas.
11:37 Again this was pointing to appear to be an infectious
11:41 agent causing lymphomas being spread by mosquitoes.
11:45 In 1964, Dr. Prickett was able to grow tumor cells
11:53 from these Burkett's lymphomas. And in these cells,
11:58 he was able to see viral particles
12:01 that looked like herpes virus.
12:03 They looked like the herpes virus morphology.
12:07 He called it the Epstein-Barr virus
12:10 which we are familiar with today.
12:13 They then found that our children
12:16 with Burkett's lymphoma had antibodies
12:19 to Epstein-Barr virus, showing that they all
12:22 being exposed to the virus. This was concluding evidence
12:26 that the virus did indeed caused the cancer.
12:30 Then in 1964, they ran into a problem.
12:35 They found that 85 percent of all healthy Americans
12:39 also had antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus
12:42 but they had no lymphoma. How could this be?
12:46 What was it, in other words that triggered
12:49 this Epstein-Barr virus to instead of just causing
12:55 asymptomatic disease in healthy Americans to going
12:59 into lymphomas in these Africans.
13:04 Well, in 1967, they learned something helpful,
13:11 Tony Epstein's young technician Elaine Hutkin
13:16 became ill with fever. She got a soar throat
13:19 and large lymph nodes in the neck.
13:21 She later got a rash, she is seen by a doctor,
13:25 they got antibodies before and after
13:30 in her blood at the lab. And the doctor diagnosed
13:35 her with mononucleosis. Tony Epstein found
13:40 that her antibodies had been negative prior
13:42 to this infection and had become positive.
13:46 And they had just now seen what an acute infection
13:50 of Epstein-Barr virus caused in an adult,
13:54 and it was mononucleosis. And doctors then confirmed
13:58 that this indeed was the etiologic agent
14:02 from mononucleosis, they tested hundreds
14:05 of college students and found that before
14:09 being infected with mononucleosis,
14:12 their Epstein-Barr virus tests were negative.
14:16 And then after this case of mononucleosis
14:20 their antibodies become positive.
14:23 Later it was learned that Epstein-Barr virus,
14:26 if it's acquired in childhood goes unnoticed
14:29 in healthy American children. If on the other hand
14:33 Epstein-Barr virus is acquired as an adult
14:36 or even a teenager it produces mononucleosis.
14:40 And this childhood inoculations were accounted for 85 percent
14:44 of the positive Epstein-Barr virus
14:45 prevalence in America. In Africa they also found
14:51 that just about everyone had antibodies
14:53 to Epstein-Barr virus, so again the question was,
14:57 what triggered the virus to progress
15:00 to Burkett's lymphoma instead of just being either
15:04 asymptomatic infection or one that caused mononucleosis.
15:10 Well, they got another insight
15:14 in an observation in Africa again.
15:17 They found that immigrants from Rwanda or Burundi
15:21 which was tumor free, and which had no malaria.
15:25 When they came to Uganda which had lot's of malaria,
15:29 they developed the lymphoma. And they did it at an older age.
15:34 Remember most of the children in Africa
15:36 were getting the lymphomas from ages two to twelve.
15:40 But among the immigrants to malaria infested Uganda
15:45 50 percent of them were over the age of 15, 26 percent
15:49 were over the age of 30. What this indicated
15:53 was that somehow malaria, getting infected with malaria
15:57 was what initiated or allowed the virus
16:00 to progress to a lymphoma. The mechanism allowing
16:05 the lymphoma, to appear, appear to be immunosuppressant.
16:10 In other words the body's immune system
16:13 was so tied up with keeping the malaria suppressed
16:17 it had nothing left to fight the cancer
16:20 that the virus was trying to produce.
16:22 It had nothing to fight the cancer
16:24 with and the virus then progressed to cancer.
16:27 Our question is, is malaria prevalent enough in Africa
16:33 to cause immunosuppressant on a large scale?
16:36 In other words, can it be the cause of these
16:43 lymphomas in Africa? And actually yes, the, we went,
16:48 our family went on a mission trip to Ghana
16:50 which is in the malaria belt. And my son, while we were there,
16:55 developed malaria and we took him
16:56 to little Adventist hospital there.
16:59 They tested his blood, they looked at under
17:00 the microscope and said yes, he has a low level of malaria.
17:04 They said, if he was a local here,
17:07 we would ignore it because every one here
17:10 has a low level of malaria, but they become immune to it,
17:14 and their immune system is fighting it constantly.
17:16 But as a foreigner this is lethal
17:20 to him unless it's treated. So we treated it
17:23 and he got better and of course he survived.
17:27 However, it did illustrated the point
17:29 that in these malaria infested places,
17:32 malaria is rampant and it is continuing
17:35 to cause immunosuppressant
17:36 as it is a burden on the immune system.
17:42 And with this immunosuppressive state,
17:44 viruses like Epstein-Barr virus can progress to cause lymphomas.
17:52 Are there other forms of immunosuppressant
17:54 that can cause and lead to cancer?
17:56 Yes actually there are,
17:57 HIV is the classic viral infection
17:59 which causes severe immunosuppressant
18:01 by destroying certain T-lymphocytes.
18:04 Can this lead to cancer? Yes, actually quoting
18:08 from an internal medicine text book up to date.
18:12 It says, HIV infected individuals
18:15 have an increased propensity to develop malignancy.
18:18 The spectrum of neoplasm in these patients is changing
18:21 especially in developed portions of the world
18:23 or the vast reduce of highly active antiretroviral therapy
18:27 has limited the immunosuppressant associated
18:29 with the HIV for prolonged periods in most patients.
18:34 It continues, it says the occurrence
18:36 of an unusually high number of cases
18:38 and an aggressive clinical course of Kaposi's sarcoma
18:42 which is another cancer was noted early
18:45 in the AIDS epidemic and Kaposi's sarcoma
18:49 was included in the AIDS defining illnesses
18:52 in early case definitions of the,
18:54 from the centers of diseases control and prevention.
18:57 Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is another type of cancer
19:00 and invades cervical cancers were subsequently added
19:04 to the AIDS defining conditions,
19:08 and this was in 1985 and 1993 respectively.
19:12 What they are showing is that if you have
19:15 the viral infection and it suppresses
19:18 your immune system by suppressing your T-cells,
19:21 you are prone to develop cancers in that suppressed immune state.
19:28 If this is the case, if a depressed immune system
19:31 can allow cancers to develop from a virus,
19:34 and then we would think that strengthening
19:37 and stimulating immune system to fight the cancer
19:40 would be effective and useful for cancer patients.
19:44 We'll find out that fever is actually such a stimulation
19:48 and in fact fevers do turn on and stimulate
19:52 the immune system and thus aid
19:53 in combating infections and cancers.
19:57 In fact, as we know, when you're infected,
20:00 you do get a fever many times.
20:03 And many times when you have a cancer,
20:05 sometimes the only symptom you have are fevers,
20:09 night sweats, chills. This is a sign that your body
20:13 is trying to turn on your immune system
20:16 through the mechanism of fever to help fight these infections.
20:19 We had a patient come at our clinic at one point
20:23 and his only complain was fevers,
20:26 chills, night sweats.
20:29 We did some tests cultured him up,
20:32 make sure he didn't had any infection, he didn't.
20:35 Then we screened him for autoimmune diseases,
20:39 mental logical diseases, he didn't have these.
20:43 And then I said well, we gonna need
20:44 to screen you for cancer, and the CAT Scan
20:47 of the abdomen showed a Renal Cell Carcinoma
20:49 above one of the, in one of the kidneys,
20:54 he had that treated and did well.
20:57 But the only symptom that he had at that time
21:00 were the fevers, the chills and the night sweats.
21:05 Do fevers indeed turn on the immune system
21:09 and stimulate it, so that it is effective
21:11 in fighting infections in cancers?
21:14 Matthew Kluger who did much of the early research
21:17 in the benefits of fever, and actually included
21:22 in the book called Fever.
21:25 In the book he makes the statement,
21:27 he says, you know, today fever is precede
21:29 to something that needs to be suppressed,
21:31 yet historically, it was proceed as beneficial.
21:36 We find that Hypocrisies as far back as 400 BC
21:41 said that nature never needs any instruction.
21:46 He wrote that during and also viral infection
21:48 that if you got a fever, this was a favorable sign
21:51 that the infection was going to clear.
21:55 Rufus of Ephesus from 100 AD wrote,
21:58 I think you cannot find another drug which heals anymore,
22:03 anymore penetrating manner than fever.
22:05 For this reason it's a good remedy,
22:07 for individuals sees with convulsions
22:09 and if they were a physician skilled enough to produce
22:11 a fever would be useless to seek any other remedy.
22:16 Later in the 1600s, noted English physician
22:21 Thomas Sydenham, he wrote theory,
22:24 he said fever is nature's engine which it brings into the field
22:28 to remove her enemy. That was very stood observation.
22:33 Lieber Meister around 1887, he also thought fevers
22:37 of modern magnitude or high magnitude
22:39 for short periods of time were beneficial.
22:41 He cautioned against fevers of long period because
22:45 these can be debilitating. It does take energy
22:47 and effort to produce a fever just like climbing a mountain
22:50 and it can wear a person out. Only in high fevers
22:55 for a long periods of time did he advocate antipyretics
22:58 or medications which would lower the fevers
23:02 Well, today there is a widespread trend to reduce
23:07 all fevers with antipyretics.
23:09 And Kluger makes a comment in his book,
23:12 he says, "That one might surmise from this widespread attempt
23:16 to reduce fevers that convincing evidence
23:18 have been presented which demonstrated
23:20 that fevers were harmful. But in fact,
23:23 this is not the case, if any thing the weight
23:26 of evidence tends to support the opposite conclusion."
23:30 So what exactly is the evidence that febrile temperatures
23:35 are beneficial for infections.
23:38 Well, late in the 1800s Louis Pasteur
23:41 was studying Anthrax, and he was trying to develop
23:44 a vaccine for it. He could easily induce
23:48 Anthrax in sheep and cows, but he couldn't induce
23:53 Anthrax in chickens. This concerned him
23:57 and he wondered why? He told the colleague
23:59 of his that he couldn't induce fevers in chickens.
24:02 The colleague challenged him, and said, I can do it.
24:05 And but after months of trying,
24:08 his colleague finally had to admit, he said, you know,
24:10 I can't induce Anthrax in chickens.
24:12 You know, he'd take the blood of an Anthrax victim
24:16 and inject in the chickens, they just ignore it.
24:18 Then Louis Pasteur said well, in this interim
24:21 I've found a way to induce Anthrax in chickens.
24:25 And his colleague was stunned, he said, how did you it?
24:28 He says, well, what we notice was that the cows
24:31 and the sheep that develop Anthrax
24:35 have temperatures running around at 38 degrees Celsius.
24:39 But the chickens have temperatures running
24:41 40 to 42 degrees Celsius. And I thought possibly
24:46 this higher temperature is protective for the chickens.
24:49 So he did an experiment, took a chicken,
24:53 a normal chicken in is normal body temperature
24:55 40 to 42 degree Celsius, injecting with Anthrax,
24:58 chicken ignored the Anthrax. He took another chicken wired
25:02 his feet to a screen, put the screen
25:05 in some cool water lowered his temperature down
25:07 to 38 degree Celsius, injected him with Anthrax
25:11 it was dead in 24 hours. And then took another chicken,
25:17 do the same treatment, put his feet on wire grating,
25:21 put the wire grating in a cool water.
25:23 Lower it's temperature to 38 degrees Celsius,
25:25 injected him with Anthrax and in a couple of hours
25:28 he started to become listless, tired, he looked like
25:33 he's gonna pass out, this were the signs of Anthrax.
25:36 At that point, they took out of the water bath,
25:39 warmed him up, dried him off and his temperature rose,
25:44 and he survived the Anthrax infection.
25:47 This is the striking example of the beneficial effects
25:51 of the higher temperatures found in the chickens.
25:55 Then there was a human example of the benefits of fever.
25:59 This was first described by Hippocrates in 450- 357 BC.
26:06 He described a mysterious diseases called
26:09 Progressive Paralysis at that time,
26:11 it would leave the victims paralyzed.
26:14 But he observed that in rare cases,
26:17 a cure or long lasting remission could occur
26:19 if the victim acquired an infectious disease
26:22 accompanied by a high fever. He thought that somehow
26:25 this high fever maybe helping to resolve the illness.
26:30 But it wasn't until 1858 that Esmark and Jensen showed
26:34 that this progressive paralysis was caused by syphilis.
26:38 They could actually see the little spirochetes
26:39 in the blood samples of people with this progressive paralysis.
26:44 In 1887 Wagner Jerrick, he was psychiatrist
26:48 researching neurosyphilis, and he noted that in China
26:51 and India both syphilis and malaria were rampant.
26:56 But strangely enough in China and India they are very rarely
27:00 found paralysis from the syphilis.
27:03 And he hypothesized that possibly the fevers
27:07 from the malaria were helping protect him from the paralysis.
27:16 So what he did, was he actually took patients,
27:20 injected them with malaria in 1927
27:24 and he found that three of them, their paralysis resolved.
27:27 He was so successful, he treated thousands of patients
27:30 with malaria and found that they were getting
27:34 a 30 percent cure rate. He then won the Noble Prize
27:38 in medicine for his work with treating syphilis
27:42 by malarial treatments and this was established
27:47 as a very effective cure at that time.
27:51 We're going to continue on our work with,
27:55 looking into fevers in immune system in our next visit.
27:59 Hope to see you there, may God bless as you, as He,
28:04 and pray that you remain healthy in the mean time.


Home

Revised 2014-12-17