Participants:
Series Code: EI
Program Code: EI190011S
|
00:36 Welcome to our Evolution Impossible journey.
00:38 I am Dr. Sven string. 00:40 And you'll definitely need to fasten your seat belts 00:42 for this trip, because we're going to be traveling 00:45 way back in time to the very beginning; 00:47 to the Big Bang itself. 00:49 Sound like an explosive topic? 00:51 Actually, you may be surprised to find out 00:54 that the popular concept that the Big Bang was an explosion 00:57 in space isn't what cosmologists actually teach. 01:01 If that sounds intriguing, come with us on this journey. 01:05 Joining me today is Dr. John Aston, who's been 01:07 doing research in this area for almost 50 years. 01:10 Good to have you here with us again. 01:13 And also, Blair Lemke. 01:14 ~ Good you could join us today. - Good to be here. 01:16 And Melvin Sandelin. 01:17 It's always good to have you back on the studio as well. 01:21 And Jeandré Roux. 01:22 We're looking forward to your insightful questions. 01:25 You know, John, as I was saying, the popular concept of the 01:29 Big Bang being this explosion of matter into space 01:33 isn't actually correct. 01:35 So could you explain to us, what is the Big Bang theory 01:38 actually telling us? 01:40 Right, okay, well the Big Bang theory 01:43 is something that Fred Hoyle, a famous British astronomer 01:48 at Cambridge University, felt was so ridiculous 01:51 that's why he called it, "Wow, it's a big bang." 01:53 ~ So it's a derogatory term? - Yes, originally meant, yes. 01:58 But the whole concept of matter or energy expanding 02:03 into space is too similar to what the Bible talks about 02:08 God creating and expanding the universe. 02:12 And so, cosmologists that really want to keep God 02:17 out of the picture, they say, "Well, this is not good. 02:20 We really don't want the earth at the center of the universe." 02:24 Because when we look out in space, it's sort of 02:26 isotropic from where we are. 02:28 It's almost as if we're in a spherical ball, 02:31 and we're near the center of it. 02:32 ~ So isotropic, explain that term to us. 02:35 That means, the density of matter is pretty well the same 02:38 in all directions throughout the galaxies. 02:39 - Wherever you look. - Yes. 02:40 So we look as if we're pretty close to being in the center. 02:44 And again, scientists that want to keep God out of the picture 02:48 say, "Whoa, this is too close to making the earth pretty special. 02:53 We seem to be in a very special place. 02:54 We don't want that." 02:56 So what they've done is they have contrived, in my view, 03:01 what we know as the current Big Bang model, 03:05 which is space expanding in a fourth dimension. 03:10 Now one of the reasons that they do that 03:12 is so that there's no center to the universe then. 03:16 And how this occurs is this: 03:18 If we imagine blowing up a balloon, 03:22 so you have a balloon, just a party balloon, 03:27 so you start and your balloon is about this size. 03:29 Now when we've got our balloon and we've blown it up 03:32 to about this size, we then take a little pen 03:37 and we draw little circles over it. 03:39 Okay, so we're going to make little polka dots. 03:41 And what do the circles represent? 03:43 They just represent little circles. 03:45 Okay. Fair enough. 03:49 So we'll just draw these little circles around. 03:52 Just like a polka dot pattern on this, okay. 03:56 And so we've got those little circles. 03:57 And now we're blowing in... 03:59 ...and it expands, okay. 04:02 So as it expands, those little circles move further 04:07 apart from one another. 04:08 And so we've now got our bigger balloon. 04:11 ~ It hasn't gone pop yet. - No, it hasn't gone pop yet. 04:14 No, no, it's not going to go bang either. 04:15 This is stabilized. This is our current situation. 04:19 This is the expanded Big Bang, in a way. 04:21 But we've got this balloon. 04:24 And I want to ask you then, where's the center of the 04:28 surface of the balloon? 04:31 ~ It's doesn't have a center. - It's doesn't have a center. 04:34 Now what we have observed, when I was blowing this balloon up, 04:38 as you had to imagine, what we were doing was 04:41 with the surface of the balloon, that skin of the balloon, 04:44 is a two dimensional surface, but it was expanding 04:49 in three dimensions. 04:51 And there's no center to that. 04:54 So if we have space, which is three dimensions, 04:58 expanding in four dimensions, again there's no center. 05:04 Just fourth dimension. 05:06 Yes, it's doesn't have to be time. 05:08 Time is outside that. 05:09 You're just expanding in a fourth dimension. 05:12 It's just a mathematical construct 05:14 involving what they call, hyperspace. 05:17 This theoretical fourth dimension. 05:20 Now they have to do that. 05:21 When they do that, then there is no center of the universe. 05:24 And it explains why the universe looks much the same 05:28 wherever we look. 05:29 Because we're on the surface of this sphere. 05:32 So called. 05:34 But why I'm using this sphere is just because 05:36 we can't, in our minds, imagine a fourth dimension. 05:40 We can't physically easily anyway, 05:42 some people might, be able to imagine 05:45 three dimensions expanding in fourth dimensions. 05:49 But we do it mathematically. 05:50 It's very easy with mathematics, as you probably know 05:52 with your math background. 05:54 But this is called the cosmological principle, 05:57 or Copernican principle. 05:59 And that is a construct to deliberately keep out 06:03 the obvious observation that we seem to be very special 06:07 and at the center of the universe. 06:08 But it relies on hyperspace. 06:10 It relies on the existence of this fourth dimension 06:14 which has never been detected and we have no evidence for it. 06:20 It's just a mathematical construct. 06:22 So it's the expansion of space itself. 06:27 - Yes. - And not just this explosion 06:29 of matter into space. 06:30 - Yes. - Okay. 06:31 And there's a number of reasons that I want to do this, too. 06:33 Because, you see, what happens is, when they believe... 06:38 Part of the evidence that they claim is for the Big Bang 06:42 is what we call the cosmic microwave background radiation, 06:47 which is this infrared or microwave radiation. 06:50 ~ It's energy that you can observe. 06:52 Yeah, microwave radiation which they say is the leftover 06:55 from the Big Bang. 06:57 And we observe this background radiation there. 07:00 Now the problem is, there's a horizon problem 07:03 for them that they have. 07:04 ~ May I first ask what that is? 07:07 ~ Right, the horizon problem is this. 07:09 That you can't see anything happening faster 07:13 than the speed of light. 07:17 ~ So there's a horizon to what we see. 07:19 Yes, so there's a horizon for energy and so forth to travel, 07:22 as far as they understand. 07:24 ~ Is that the cosmic microwave background radiation? 07:29 ~ No, what it is is this: 07:30 That if that is... 07:32 What they say this microwave background radiation is, 07:35 it's the leftover remnant radiation from the massive 07:38 Big Bang in the beginning. 07:40 So it's what has been leftover. 07:42 But the fact that it's so uniform means that 07:46 it has to have spread uniformly across the universe. 07:51 But if the universe has been expanding to the size 07:55 that it is in the time that it has, even if this 07:58 microwave radiation was traveling at the speed of light, 08:01 there's not enough time for it to distribute itself uniformly. 08:06 So they have their own problems, right? 08:09 But if you have space expanding in the fourth dimension, 08:13 and you have it all close together, then you can 08:16 have this distribution occurring while it's all close together, 08:19 and then space is stretched out. 08:21 And so, it isn't limited by your sort of, you know, 08:26 luminary constraints of the speed of light. 08:28 So these are all fancy mathematical constructs. 08:33 And you run into, you know, other major problems 08:35 like where did the energy come from 08:38 to expand it like that so quickly. 08:41 It has to happen, you know, so quickly. 08:44 There's so many problems with the Big Bang, yeah. 08:48 So tell us, so you've got the cosmic microwave background 08:52 radiation you mentioned. 08:53 Is there any other evidence for the Big Bang? 08:58 In terms of what the cosmologists would use 09:01 to support this theory. 09:03 Ummm. 09:05 Well, of course, you know, they date the ages of the... 09:10 They detect particular elements in the stars. 09:13 And from the radioactive elements that they detect there, 09:17 they, you know, calculate the ages of, you know, 09:20 14 billion years, and so forth. 09:23 So they make these sort of estimates. 09:25 But look, the bottom line is, there's so many problems 09:29 with the Big Bang. 09:30 But this just isn't being talked about. 09:32 We can have a look at some. 09:34 For example, if this cosmic microwave background 09:40 radiation that they detect was real, we would expect 09:43 shadows behind certain nebular and so forth like this. 09:47 We don't observe any shadows. 09:48 They've studied a whole lot of these particular... 09:50 Or behind galaxies. 09:52 They've observed a whole lot of galaxies, over 30 I think, 09:55 and none of them we've observed any shadows behind. 09:58 So that's powerful evidence that the Big Bang 10:00 actually didn't occur. 10:02 That's really powerful evidence. 10:03 What about the red shift in galaxies 10:07 and stars that they've detected? 10:09 Well, these are used to calculate, you know, 10:12 the speeds of stars and movements, and things like that. 10:17 From the Doppler effect. 10:19 Now again, it's just all physics. 10:21 But one of the things that, again, they've got so many 10:24 major problems; for example, they have to have 10:30 inflation theory, in that there is no known laws of physics 10:34 that can explain how this singularity... 10:39 All they mean by that, they talk about singularity exploding. 10:42 What the singularity is: 10:44 Well there's all different views on it. 10:45 You know, an infinite mass, infinite heat, 10:48 infinite energy sort of something at the beginning. 10:52 - So it suddenly expanded. ~ It sounds pretty hot. 10:53 Yes, well it's the hot Big Bang model. 10:55 There are cold Big Bang models too. 10:56 There's lots of different Big Bang models. 10:59 But the thing is, really in order for it to work, 11:02 if we apply the standard laws of physics, 11:05 it doesn't work. 11:06 ~ So physics breaks down. - Yeah, physics breaks down. 11:10 So you just have this whole game of mathematics there, 11:14 which is really fun, you know. 11:16 And you can be creative in mathematics. 11:19 But what the bottom line is, they have to have 11:21 what they call inflation theory. 11:23 Which is, the laws of physics were very different back then. 11:27 And yet, they criticize us for believing in creation. 11:30 They say, "Well, you can't test creation. 11:32 Therefore, it's not a scientific testable theory. 11:36 Therefore, you can't teach it in school. 11:38 But we're going to teach Big Bang with inflation theory." 11:41 Hang on, you can't test inflation theory. 11:44 I mean, this is just so wrong, you know. 11:48 ~ Dr. Aston? ~ You have a question? 11:49 Yeah, that's what I had a question about. 11:50 Because that really struck me as I read your book, 11:53 that you wrote that one of the things that would be 11:56 necessary for the Big Bang to work is the inflation theory. 11:59 But at the same time this cosmic microwave background radiation 12:05 is cited as one of the biggest evidences 12:08 that the Big Bang happened, but it would need that 12:12 inflation theory which has never been tested or observed 12:16 or seen, and it is even defying the laws of physics 12:21 as we know it. 12:22 How can this, then, be used as one of the biggest evidences 12:26 when it's based on a big assumption? 12:29 ~ Yeah. 12:30 Yes, and the thing is, the average person 12:33 doesn't realize this. 12:35 But the reason why scientists continue working this area 12:40 is that it's really the only theory they've got, you know. 12:43 I mean, they have string theory, and people are coming up with 12:46 all different types of theories as the present time. 12:49 But it's the model that most people are playing with, 12:52 because the other models have big problems as well. 12:55 But what gets me is that if we just simply look at it, 12:58 the cosmic microwave background radiation 13:01 levels are simply what we would calculate 13:04 from that generated by a star light. 13:08 You know, it just fits what we observe. 13:10 You know, there's a very simple explanation for it. 13:13 One of the other fascinating things is that we have a 13:15 law in physics called the law of baryon number. 13:18 And what that says is that if we convert energy into matter, 13:23 we produce equal amounts of matter and antimatter. 13:26 So most have seen the equation, 13:28 E = mass times the speed of light squared. 13:33 E = mc2 13:35 And so, we can convert energy into matter. 13:37 But when we do that, we generate both. 13:39 So, for example, the antimatter to an electron 13:41 would be a positron, right? 13:43 Now when we look out in space, 13:45 we observe something like 95% matter. 13:50 We don't observe a 50-50 balance of matter and antimatter. 13:54 There's only about 5% antimatter out in space. 13:57 ~ How does that relate to dark matter or dark energy? 14:00 So this is where it comes in. 14:01 The dark matter is there to provide 14:06 the balance in that equation. 14:08 But also, the other problem that they have is this: 14:10 That when you convert energy into matter, 14:14 you produce individual atoms and nuclei. 14:17 These have to come together in some way. 14:19 Now the simplest ones: hydrogen, helium; they're gases. 14:23 And they just stay apart. 14:24 So you've got to somehow, to synthesize the higher elements 14:29 you've got to somehow produce super intense 14:32 gravitational fields. 14:33 So you've got to somehow get these 14:36 gaseous elements together again. 14:39 They're not going to come together. 14:40 And so, in order to get them to come together 14:43 to synthesize the higher elements, they say, well 14:46 there must be dark matter that produces this intense 14:50 gravitational field that pulls all the gases together 14:53 so that they can condense and begin to fuse and 14:56 produce the higher elements. 14:58 ~ It sounds so scientific, it must be. 15:00 It must be. 15:02 The problem is, we've never detected that either, you know. 15:06 And these are all these constructs that they have 15:09 made up to try and save the Big Bang theory. 15:13 Dark matter, dark energy is, again, where this energy 15:16 came from to sort of just expand the universe fast enough. 15:21 ~ The inflationary period. - Yeah. 15:22 ~ It's interesting. - All these things. 15:24 And without them, they fail. 15:25 And one of the things that people don't realize, 15:27 scientists working in the field realize this, but 15:32 all the attempted experimental, or all the predictions 15:37 that would fall out of the Big Bang theory, 15:40 when they attempted to test them experimentally 15:43 have failed. 15:45 It doesn't predict the right number of, you know, sort of 15:49 evolving galaxies and all this sort of thing. 15:51 This has been known for, you know, some time now. 15:56 Matter of fact, in the early 2000's, about 100 or 200 16:00 scientists signed a statement that was published in, 16:05 New Scientist, saying, "Look, there's so many problems 16:09 with the Big Bang theory, we really should stop teaching it." 16:12 You know, when you had people like Halton Arp 16:14 who was the chief astronomer at Max Planck Institute in Germany, 16:19 you had Thomas Gold at Cornell University; 16:22 you had these top university professors saying this, 16:25 "Hang on, it's not working." 16:30 It doesn't work. It doesn't fit the scenario. 16:33 The biblical picture fits what we observe out there. 16:38 That the earth is special, we're near the center of the universe, 16:42 and it was made as the environment around us. 16:45 Dr. John, I was curious, you talked a little bit earlier on 16:48 about the inflation theory, dark matter, dark energy, 16:52 these sorts of things, these hypothetical entities 16:56 that cosmologists have, I guess, created to try to 16:59 make the Big Bang theory seem plausible. 17:03 I guess I'm wondering, is this a common practice 17:05 in the scientific world to kind of create hypothetical entities 17:10 to try to explain things? 17:11 Is that something that holds water in the scientific world? 17:14 Obviously it does in the Big Bang theory here, 17:16 but it just doesn't seem very... 17:18 ~ Well, scientific hypothesis, yes, this is a common approach 17:23 that people use. 17:25 And the idea is, okay, we want to see how this system works. 17:28 We propose a hypothesis, then we design some experiments 17:32 to test that hypothesis, then we see if they work. 17:34 If it doesn't work, then usually we try to change the hypothesis 17:38 or throw it away altogether. 17:39 ~ Some of those hypothetical entities? 17:41 ~ Yes. And so the Big Bang theory is something that 17:43 people have been working on for a real long period of time. 17:46 They built these very large high-energy colliders 17:51 to try and understand what happens in the nucleus 17:54 of an atom under really extreme conditions. 17:57 How can we try and model what sort of conditions 18:00 were there at the Big Bang. 18:01 But essentially, the Big Bang model is saying that 18:04 nothing somehow became something, you know. 18:08 Quantum fluctuation in a vacuum, and this sort of thing. 18:12 Well, it's not really a true nothing that they're 18:15 talking about when they're doing their equations there. 18:17 It's sort of a quantum vacuum. 18:19 Lawrence Krauss with his book, A Universe From Nothing, 18:22 actually equivocates on that word, "nothing." 18:25 He's not talking about nothing, he's talking about something. 18:28 Yes, yes. 18:31 ~ I have a question about that. 18:33 Maybe risking to sound like a dummy, because maybe there's 18:36 explanations for it that I don't understand or haven't heard. 18:39 But for me, the Big Bang theory, even if all of that 18:44 would have happened and everything worked as they said, 18:48 it still does not explain where the first things came from. 18:52 Right? Because for a big bang to occur, 18:55 you need something that makes a big bang. 18:58 And that is something that I've never understood. 19:00 Where then does that come from? 19:04 And the Bible does give us a picture 19:06 where everything came from. 19:07 It came from God. 19:08 So that to me... 19:10 ~ So what you're saying, Melvin, is it really defies 19:12 the logic of cause and effect. 19:14 ~ Yeah. - So you get this effect, 19:15 a universe, but there's no cause for it. 19:18 ~ Exactly. 19:19 Yeah, so there's a philosophical argument 19:22 that essentially goes along the lines that if something has a 19:25 beginning, it must have had a cause. 19:27 And it's fascinated me that the Bible, when God describes 19:31 Himself as God, He talks about Himself 19:35 being the self-existent one. 19:37 In other words, "I don't have a cause. 19:40 I have always been." 19:41 And this is a fascinating concept, because the fact that 19:45 we are here is evidence that, you know, 19:49 it's evidence that something has happened. 19:52 And I know I've spoken to other people, 19:54 and we've asked ourselves the question, 19:56 "Why should anything exist?" 19:59 ~ That's a very deep question. - And when we look around... 20:01 But it is, and it's so intricate. 20:02 You know, I saw the pictures earlier of the humming bird. 20:05 It's so phenomenal. And the giraffe. 20:06 And the amazing, you know, creatures there. 20:08 But even a tree, when you think, you know, that tree has to 20:11 get that water all the way up. 20:12 You know, the amazing mechanism and design 20:15 to be able to do that without having some 20:18 high pressure electric pump. 20:19 You know, every 15 feet, every 30 or 40 feet 20:23 you've got an atmosphere of water sort of thing, 20:25 atmospheric pressure that you've got to overcome. 20:28 Why should anything exist? Why does it exist? 20:32 But it does. Where did it come from? 20:35 It blows your mind. 20:36 And that's where God fits the picture perfectly. 20:39 And it amazes me, people say, because people say, 20:42 "Well, who created God?" 20:44 Well, you're going to run out of problems because 20:46 the issue is, we are here. 20:48 But God, in this Book that so many people 20:52 put down as, "Oh, you know, it's just myth," 20:54 here we have God saying, "I am non-material, 20:58 and I am self-existent." 21:00 And this is brilliant. 21:01 It explains everything, really. 21:04 And it is an explanation that works. 21:06 All these assumptions just make me think of, like, 21:08 Hollywood movies. 21:09 ~ Yeah. - It's just far from reality. 21:12 But yet people still choose to believe the Big Bang. 21:15 ~ I mean, talking about movies, even Maria 21:17 in, The Sound of Music, knew that nothing comes from nothing. 21:19 Nothing ever could. 21:21 It's amazing insight. 21:22 But bringing you down from the stratospheric kind of 21:25 talk about the universe down to earth, 21:28 one of the things that comes out in science 21:30 is that the earth is in a Goldilocks zone. 21:34 And I just wondered if you could explain that to us. 21:36 Obviously it's, you know, not just the story about 21:39 Goldilocks with the porridge and the nice warm bed. 21:43 What's that to do with the earth, the Goldilocks zone? 21:45 Yes, okay, so there have been some authors that 21:47 refer to the position of the earth as very special. 21:51 And when you think about it, we're at just the right distance 21:55 from the sun so that we don't cook and we don't freeze. 21:59 Our gravity is just right that hydrogen escapes 22:02 and doesn't poison the atmosphere. 22:04 Because water does slowly dissociate into hydrogen 22:06 and oxygen in small amounts. 22:07 There's an equilibrium constant there. 22:09 So we don't get poisoned by that sort of thing. 22:12 The moon is in just the right place to cause 22:15 the tides and this sort of thing. 22:17 And this is another evidence for a young earth too. 22:19 I mean, the origin of the moon. 22:21 The astronomers have really no satisfactory explanation. 22:26 They've studied the composition now, 22:28 especially based on titanium, for example. 22:31 One of the most abundant metals in the earth's crust. 22:33 It's the same level in the moon. 22:35 And of course, the moon is dragging against the earth, 22:39 so it's actually slowing the rotation of 22:41 the earth down very slightly. 22:43 And as a result, it's absorbing that angular momentum 22:46 and moving slightly further away. 22:48 And so, again, if the earth was thousands of millions 22:54 of years old, it's impossible; the moon would have 22:55 crashed in and wouldn't have been here. 22:58 So it just doesn't fit, the ages. 23:01 There's so many things like that as well. 23:03 But again, we're at just the right temperature for water. 23:07 Our atmosphere is just right. 23:11 And we have so much water on this planet. 23:13 So these are powerful reasons why you believe 23:16 that the earth is young. 23:17 But do you also believe that the entire universe 23:20 is young as well? 23:22 What leads you to that conclusion 23:25 when there's all this evidence, or supposed evidence, 23:28 for billions of years for the universe itself? 23:32 Yes, sure. 23:33 One of the reasons that I think about it is that 23:35 when I read the astronomy books, I read so much 23:38 research about things that are happening on our time scale. 23:41 It's almost as if we're meant to be watching it. 23:45 Of course, the Bible describes that. 23:47 And so how can we know, you know, the age of things? 23:51 And I was reading a paper just the other day 23:53 by a Japanese astronomer who first observed 23:57 this particular white dwarf expanding. 24:02 And the thing is, this star exploded, you know, changed, 24:06 exploded and then shrunk right back down. 24:08 So it went through a lifetime cycle in about five years, 24:11 five years our time. 24:14 And I know people get worried about 24:16 the star light time problem. 24:18 And we did talk about it the other day. 24:21 ~ So that's, how can you get start light 24:23 from stars or galaxies which are billions of light years away, 24:28 but we could actually see it if the universe is young. 24:30 So what we need to remember is that the light year is a 24:33 measure of distance. 24:34 It's a measure of how far light would travel 24:38 if we average the speed of light. 24:40 But as we discussed in one of the other programs, 24:43 we can't actually measure accurately and know accurately 24:47 the one way speed of light. 24:49 And it seems to me to fit a lot of data 24:54 if the one way speed of light is infinite, 24:57 if it's instantaneous. 24:59 And therefore, the return... 25:01 Now people say, "Oh, you know, you're wishful thinking." 25:04 Well, it fits mathematically. It's quite allowable. 25:06 It doesn't violate any of the laws of physics. 25:09 Because the value of "c" that we use 25:11 is the average of the two-way speed of light. 25:14 That's the value that we use. 25:16 We just use the average of the two-way speed of light. 25:19 And, you know, the other factors are, when we think about 25:24 in terms of time, why would God want us to be 25:26 looking at things in the past? 25:29 It makes so much sense that we are able 25:34 to see things, you know, here and now. 25:36 And also we have the time dilation problem. 25:38 The whole problem that time is affected by gravity, 25:41 as we talked about before as well. 25:44 And so, we're measuring things in terms of earth time, now. 25:48 You know, this is very important to understand, 25:51 that we're measuring things in earth time. 25:54 And those, you know, big distances for light travel 25:57 may not in actual fact be a problem. 25:59 The evidence in my view is that the universe is very young. 26:04 And George Ellis said that you can actually create 26:06 any cosmological model you like. 26:08 It just depends on the philosophical assumptions 26:12 that you're making. - Yes, that's right. 26:15 Could you just maybe quickly explain what he meant there? 26:18 Well again, essentially what he's saying is that 26:21 most of the current models that are being developed 26:24 are models to try and eliminate God. 26:27 And they're based on that particular world view. 26:29 And so, for example, John Wheeler got his 26:31 PhD back in the early 50's on the multiverse. 26:34 You know. 26:36 That there are millions of universes. 26:37 That there are different space time systems. 26:40 That's right. 26:41 One of the other things, just to mention very quickly, 26:43 is that quantum mechanics predicts instantaneous 26:46 interactions at a distance faster than the speed of light. 26:49 There are lots of interactions faster than the speed of light. 26:52 And we'll have to pick that up another time. 26:54 So the Big Bang is based on massive assumptions. 26:57 And it's been patched up with so many fudge factors. 27:00 It makes me feel that the Big Bang is a cosmological model 27:03 that needs to be traded in for a better model. 27:06 And you can find the best model, the best explanation 27:09 in the Bible itself. 27:11 This timeless best seller starts with those majestic words, 27:14 "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." 27:18 Now that's something you can really trust. 27:21 If you want to discover why the Big Bang theory fizzles, 27:24 just go to your favorite online bookstore 27:27 and get a copy of Dr. John Aston's book... 27:31 You won't regret that small investment. 27:34 Did you know that Dr. John Aston is not the only scientist 27:37 who has rejected Darwin's theory of evolution? 27:40 There are literally hundreds, even thousands of scientists 27:43 who have decided that the Bible is telling us the truth. 27:47 Join us next time as we introduce some of those 27:50 scientists and the powerful reasons 27:52 why they reject evolution. |
Revised 2020-04-08